Try Claude
SEO AnalysisAudit pages for ranking issues
AI Tools for UX Researchers
AI tools that help UX researchers synthesise user feedback, analyse competitors, generate research reports, and uncover insights faster across qualitative and quantitative studies.
Get started for free
Works in Chat, Cowork and Code
Shipping/Billing Address Confusion
11/12 sessions — most frequent
No Processing Progress Indicator
9/12 sessions — payment anxiety trigger
Card Decline Error Messages
8/12 — unclear, not actionable
Password Requirements Hidden
6/12 — only shown after failed submit
CTA Button Placement
5/12 — missed below fold on mobile
Interview and survey synthesis
Upload transcripts or paste raw notes from user interviews and surveys to get structured theme analysis, affinity clusters, and prioritised insight summaries — cutting synthesis time from days to minutes.
Here are transcripts from 15 usability test sessions on our checkout flow. Identify the top pain points, categorise by severity, and pull direct quotes for each.
Identified 6 core pain points. Top 3 by frequency: (1) confusion between shipping and billing address fields (11/15 sessions), (2) no progress indicator during payment processing (9/15), (3) unclear error messaging on card decline (8/15). Quotes attached per theme.
ToolRouter research
Shipping vs Billing Confusion
11/15 sessions · Severity: High · "I didn't know which address to use"
No Payment Progress Indicator
9/15 sessions · Severity: High · "I thought it froze"
Card Decline Error Messages
8/15 sessions · Severity: Medium · "The message made no sense"
CTA Hidden Below Fold
5/15 sessions · Severity: Medium · "I couldn't find the button"
Auto-Fill Breaking Fields
4/15 sessions · Severity: Low · inconsistent across browsers
Competitor UX benchmarking
Audit competitors' digital experiences for usability patterns, accessibility compliance, and information architecture to inform your own design decisions with industry context.
Benchmark the onboarding flows of Figma, Miro, and Canva. What UX patterns do they use, where do users get stuck based on reviews, and what differentiates the leaders?
Benchmarking complete. Figma uses progressive disclosure in onboarding (template-first), Miro leads with collaborative framing, Canva uses role-based personalisation. App Store reviews flag template discovery friction for Miro (1,200+ mentions) and export confusion for Canva.
ToolRouter analyze_reviews
Figma — Top Complaint
Performance on large files — 800+ mentions
Miro — Top Complaint
Template discovery friction — 1,200+ mentions
Canva — Top Complaint
Export format confusion — 950+ mentions
Figma — Top Praise
Auto-layout and components — 2,100+ mentions
Canva — Top Praise
Ease of use for non-designers — 3,400+ mentions
Participant recruitment and screener outreach
Build qualified participant lists for user studies by finding professionals matching your demographic and role criteria. Reach the right users faster than relying on panel providers alone.
Find 40 senior product managers at B2B SaaS companies with 50–500 employees in the US and UK for a moderated interview study on workflow automation tools.
Found 40 matches. 28 US-based, 12 UK. Roles span companies including mid-market SaaS, productivity tools, and project management software. Profiles include LinkedIn, company size, and seniority. Ready for screener outreach.
ToolRouter find_leads
NameTitleCompany
Sophie HallSenior Product Managermonday.com
James OkaforPrincipal PMZapier
Priya MehtaPM — AutomationAsana
Tom WhitfieldSenior PMTrello / Atlassian
28 US · 12 UK · LinkedIn profiles included · screener ready
Social and community listening
Mine Reddit threads, social media discussions, and community forums to understand organic user language, frustrations, and feature requests — before you run a single interview.
Search Reddit for the most common complaints and feature requests about project management tools in the past 6 months. Focus on r/projectmanagement, r/productivity, and r/remotework.
Analysed 340 relevant threads. Top complaints: (1) notification overload (discussed in 28% of threads), (2) poor mobile experience (21%), (3) complex pricing tiers (19%). Feature requests: AI task prioritisation, better integrations with Slack, offline mode.
ToolRouter search_posts
Notification Overload
28% of threads — top complaint across all tools
Poor Mobile Experience
21% of threads — slow sync and limited features
Complex Pricing Tiers
19% of threads — feature gating frustration
Feature Request: AI Prioritisation
Mentioned in 340+ comments across subs
Feature Request: Offline Mode
Strong demand in r/remotework (180+ comments)
Research report generation
Compile findings from multiple studies into structured, shareable research reports for stakeholders. Turn raw insights into clear recommendations with supporting evidence.
Compile a research report from our Q1 user interviews, survey data, and usability test findings. Structure it for a product leadership audience — executive summary, key findings, and prioritised recommendations.
Report generated: 8-page document with executive summary, 5 key insight themes, severity-rated issue log, and 12 prioritised design recommendations. Includes supporting quotes and data points throughout.
ToolRouter research
Studies Synthesised
15 interviews · 280 survey responses · 8 usability tests
Top Insight
Onboarding drop-off at step 3 linked to unclear value messaging
Severity 1 Issues
4 issues blocking activation — prioritised for Q2 sprint
Design Recommendations
12 recommendations · prioritised by impact × effort
Report Format
8 pages · exec summary + evidence appendix
ToolRouter create_chart
Issues Found
Accessibility and heuristic audits
Run quick heuristic evaluations and accessibility checks on digital products to identify usability issues before investing in user studies — or to prepare a prioritised audit backlog.
Run a usability and accessibility audit on our checkout flow at shop.example.com — identify WCAG failures, confusing navigation patterns, and performance issues that could hurt conversion.
Audit complete: 4 WCAG AA failures (missing alt text, low contrast on CTA buttons, unlabelled form fields, keyboard trap in modal). 3 usability heuristic violations. Page load 4.2s on mobile (needs work). Full report with fix recommendations attached.
ToolRouter audit_page
Missing Alt Text
3 product images — screen reader blind
CTA Button Contrast
Low contrast on "Complete Order" — fails WCAG AA
Unlabelled Form Fields
Card number + CVV using placeholder-only
Keyboard Trap in Modal
Address editor modal — focus escapes
Mobile Load Time
4.2s — likely impacting conversion rate
ToolRouter run_audit
Score (seconds)
Ready-to-use prompts
Synthesise interview themes
Analyse these user interview transcripts and identify the top 5 recurring themes, each with supporting quotes and an estimated frequency across the sessions.
App review mining
Analyse App Store reviews for [app name] from the past 12 months. Identify the top pain points, most requested features, and any usability issues mentioned in negative reviews.
Recruit study participants
Find 30 UX designers and product managers at companies with 50–500 employees in the US for a moderated usability study. Include LinkedIn profiles and company context.
Competitor onboarding audit
Audit the onboarding experience of [competitor URL] — analyse the IA, identify usability heuristic violations, and check accessibility compliance against WCAG 2.1 AA.
Reddit pain point research
Search Reddit for user discussions about frustrations with [product category] tools in the past 6 months. Identify the most common complaints and unmet needs.
Research report
Compile a stakeholder research report from this raw interview and survey data. Include an executive summary, key themes, supporting evidence, and prioritised recommendations.
Page speed and accessibility
Run a Lighthouse audit on [URL] and identify performance bottlenecks, WCAG accessibility violations, and SEO issues that should be flagged in a UX review.
Competitor review comparison
Compare App Store and Google Play reviews for [app A], [app B], and [app C]. What are users saying positively and negatively about each? Where is there unmet need?
Tools to power your best work
Page Speed TestPerformance, SEO & Web Vitals
Lead FinderFind & enrich companies and people
Competitor ResearchDeep intel from a single URL
Generate ChartTurn data into chart images fast
Audio TranscriberSpeech-to-text with speaker labels
Deep ResearchAI research reports with citations
App Review AnalysisTurn reviews into product insights
Search creators, tags & posts
165+ tools.
One conversation.
Everything ux researchers need from AI, connected to the assistant you already use. No extra apps, no switching tabs.
Discovery research sprint
Run a full discovery phase from social listening through to a synthesised insight report ready for design decisions.
Usability study end-to-end
From participant recruitment through to a delivered research report.
Competitor UX benchmarking package
Build a comprehensive competitive UX benchmark to inform product strategy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can AI tools actually synthesise qualitative research reliably?
Deep Research and related tools handle synthesis of interview transcripts, survey text, and forum discussions well — identifying themes, clustering by frequency, and surfacing representative quotes. We recommend treating the output as a strong starting synthesis that you validate and refine rather than a final deliverable.
How useful is app review mining for UX research?
App Review Analysis is valuable for competitive research and for auditing your own product at scale. Reviews contain organic user language about real pain points and feature gaps that are hard to get from surveys. It is particularly useful for discovery phases and for building screener questions before interviews.
Can I use Lead Finder to recruit research participants?
Yes — Lead Finder lets you build targeted lists of professionals matching your study criteria (role, company size, industry, geography). This is particularly useful for B2B studies where specialist audiences are hard to reach through standard panel providers.
What accessibility standards does the SEO auditor check against?
The SEO Analysis tool checks against WCAG 2.1 AA criteria within its Lighthouse-style audit, flagging common issues like missing alt text, colour contrast failures, unlabelled form fields, and keyboard navigation problems. For a full manual WCAG audit, the automated output is a strong starting baseline.
How can UX researchers use social media monitoring for research?
Social and Reddit research tools allow you to monitor what users say about products and categories in natural, unmoderated contexts. This is useful for understanding organic language, identifying emerging frustrations, and tracking sentiment shifts around product changes — complementing formal user study methods.
Give your AI superpowers.
Get started for free
Works in Chat, Cowork and Code