Try Claude
Academic ResearchSearch papers, authors, citations
AI Tools for Litigation Consultants
AI tools that help litigation consultants research case law, analyze financial damages, screen parties, and build expert report foundations faster.
Get started for free
Works in Chat, Cowork and Code
Reasonable Certainty Standard
Before-and-after requires pre-breach baseline — 27 relevant federal cases found
9th Circuit — Imaging3
Excluded: inadequate comparables for yardstick method
6th Circuit — Compuware
Excluded: projections without historical business basis
Admitted Methodology
Before-and-after with documented pre-breach revenue trend — most commonly admitted
Key Factor
Courts require reliable methodology + sufficient factual basis — both required
Case law research for damages and liability
Research legal precedents on damages methodologies, expert testimony standards, and liability frameworks across US, UK, and other jurisdictions. Ground expert opinions in established case law.
Find US federal circuit court cases on the admissibility of lost profits expert testimony under Daubert. What standards have courts applied to exclude or admit damages experts?
Found 27 relevant federal cases. Key Daubert factors applied to damages experts: (1) reliable methodology (yardstick requires comparables; before-and-after requires pre-breach baseline), (2) sufficient factual basis, (3) reasonable certainty (not speculative). Recent exclusions: Imaging3 (9th Cir) — inadequate comparables; Compuware (6th Cir) — excluded projections without historical basis. Full citations attached.
ToolRouter search_cases
Daubert Factor 1
Reliable methodology — yardstick requires comparable firms
Daubert Factor 2
Sufficient factual basis — pre-breach baseline required
Daubert Factor 3
Reasonable certainty — not speculative or conjectural
Recent Exclusion: Imaging3
9th Cir — excluded for inadequate yardstick comparables
Recent Exclusion: Compuware
6th Cir — excluded projections without historical basis
Financial damages modeling
Build rigorous lost profits, unjust enrichment, or diminution in value calculations. Model but-for scenarios, apply discount rates, and present structured damages quantifications that withstand expert scrutiny.
Calculate lost profits damages for a plaintiff software company with $8M pre-breach revenue growing 22% annually. Breach occurred 3.5 years ago. Use before-and-after method. Apply WACC of 11.5% for present value. Show annual but-for vs actual revenue and cumulative damages.
But-for revenue year 1-3.5: $9.76M, $11.91M, $14.53M (partial year $8.88M). Actual revenue declined to $5.2M and stagnated. Lost profits (undiscounted): $23.5M over 3.5 years. PV at 11.5% WACC: $20.1M. Prejudgment interest at state statutory rate 8%: +$4.6M. Total damages: $24.7M. Annual comparison table and methodology notes attached.
ToolRouter calculate
But-For Revenue ($M)
Actual Revenue ($M)
Regulatory enforcement and public record research
Research regulatory enforcement history, SEC filings, and public records relevant to the parties in a litigation matter. Build factual context and identify prior conduct patterns.
Pull all SEC enforcement actions involving the defendant company and its named officers. Also retrieve the last 5 years of their 10-K filings to review related party transactions and legal contingency disclosures.
2 prior SEC enforcement actions found: 2019 accounting irregularities (settled $4.1M, no admission) and 2022 officer trading investigation (closed without action). 10-K review: legal contingency footnotes disclose 3 pending matters. Related party transactions grew 340% over 5 years — potential undisclosed conflicts. Documents extracted.
ToolRouter search_actions
2019 — Accounting Irregularities
Settled $4.1M — no admission of wrongdoing
2022 — Officer Trading Investigation
Closed without action — on record
Pattern
2 prior SEC engagements — relevant to willfulness analysis
ToolRouter search_filings
Legal Contingencies
3 pending matters disclosed in footnotes across 5 years
Related Party Transactions
Grew 340% over 5 years — potential undisclosed conflicts
Auditor Notes
No going concern; clean opinions — normal
Economic and industry research for expert reports
Research industry economics, market conditions, and academic literature to support expert opinions on causation, industry standards, and but-for scenarios in complex commercial litigation.
Research the market conditions and competitive dynamics in enterprise cloud storage from 2020 to 2024 to support a but-for scenario for a breach of contract matter involving a storage software company.
Enterprise cloud storage CAGR 2020-2024: 22.4%. Key players: AWS S3, Azure Blob, Google Cloud Storage. Mid-market: significant consolidation, average deal size grew 35%. AI/ML workloads drove >40% of new storage deployments by 2023. Defendant's niche (compliance-grade storage for financial services): estimated 18% CAGR — supports plaintiff's higher growth projections. 6 peer-reviewed sources attached.
ToolRouter research
Market CAGR 2020–2024
22.4% — strong market for but-for analysis
Mid-Market Consolidation
Average deal size grew 35% — favorable for plaintiff growth projection
AI/ML Storage Demand
>40% of new deployments by 2023 — accelerating segment
Plaintiff's Niche CAGR
Compliance-grade financial services storage — est. 18% CAGR
Expert Opinion Support
Higher growth projection defensible — 6 peer-reviewed sources
ToolRouter search_papers
TitleAuthorsJournal
Enterprise Cloud Adoption and Market GrowthZhang et al.J. Information Systems
Compliance Storage in Financial ServicesNguyen & ParkFinancial Innovation
AI Workload Storage RequirementsChen et al.IEEE Transactions
6 peer-reviewed sources · sorted by relevance
Party background investigation
Research litigation parties through public records, corporate registries, and sanctions databases. Identify undisclosed relationships, prior legal history, and background facts relevant to credibility and damages.
Look up the corporate registry history and ownership for the defendant LLC, screen the principals against watchlists, and search for prior litigation or adverse media involving the managing partners.
Company: incorporated 2017, changed name twice, principal registered in two other dissolved LLCs with same address. Owner 1: clean on sanctions/watchlists. Owner 2: 1 civil judgment in Florida ($180K unpaid debt, 2021), adverse media: 2 news articles on related business disputes. Corporate structure map compiled.
ToolRouter get_company
EventDateDetail
Incorporation2017Delaware LLC — original name Acme Holdings LLC
Name Change 12019Renamed to Vertex Capital LLC
Name Change 22021Renamed to current entity name
Related Entities2017–20222 dissolved LLCs at same registered address — same principals
Corporate structure map compiled · flag for expert report
ToolRouter screen_entity
Owner 1
Clean — no sanctions, watchlist, or adverse media hits
Owner 2 — Civil Judgment
FL civil judgment $180K unpaid debt (2021)
Owner 2 — Adverse Media
2 news articles on related business disputes (2020, 2022)
OFAC / EU / UN
No sanctions matches — both principals
Ready-to-use prompts
Lost profits case law
Find US state and federal cases on lost profits damages in commercial contract disputes. Focus on the reasonable certainty standard and cases where courts rejected or accepted expert damages calculations.
Cartel damages methodology
Search for peer-reviewed papers and court-accepted methodologies for quantifying price-fixing cartel overcharge damages. Include comparison of yardstick, before-and-after, and simulation approaches with accuracy benchmarks.
Damages present value model
Model lost profits damages for a retail business with $4.5M pre-event revenue declining 40% after a fire. Calculate 3-year lost profits using before-and-after method. Apply 9% discount rate and include prejudgment interest at 6.5% simple rate.
SEC filing review
Pull the last 4 years of 10-K and 10-Q filings for [company] and extract: (1) all legal proceedings footnotes, (2) related party transactions, (3) any management changes or auditor changes.
UK case law research
Find English and Welsh Court of Appeal cases on breach of fiduciary duty and account of profits remedy in commercial disputes. Include the leading authorities and how courts have quantified disgorgement damages.
Industry economics research
Research the market structure and growth rates in the US independent pharmacy sector from 2018 to 2023. I need industry benchmarks for revenue per location, gross margin, and market consolidation trends to support a business valuation dispute.
Party sanctions check
Screen the following individuals and entities involved in a commercial fraud dispute against OFAC, EU sanctions, UK sanctions, and adverse media. Flag any matches or elevated-risk findings.
Corporate registry investigation
Look up the UK Companies House and US state registry records for these three related entities. Pull all directors, PSC owners, previous names, and cross-reference shared directors between the entities.
Tools to power your best work
Generate ChartTurn data into chart images fast
SEC FilingsSEC EDGAR filings & financial data
Deep ResearchAI research reports with citations
Regulatory ActionsSEC, CFPB, FDIC & Federal Register
Financial CalculatorDCF, bonds, options & portfolios
Word DocumentsCreate, read & modify Word docs
People SearchFind anyone across 500+ sites
Company LookupCompany data for UK, US & EU
165+ tools.
One conversation.
Everything litigation consultants need from AI, connected to the assistant you already use. No extra apps, no switching tabs.
Expert report research foundation
Build the legal, economic, and factual research foundation for an expert damages or liability report.
Commercial fraud matter preparation
Build factual background on parties and prior conduct for a commercial fraud or financial dispute.
Damages quantification and presentation
Build the damages model and supporting presentation for deposition or trial.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which jurisdictions does the legal research tool cover?
Case Law searches across 15+ jurisdictions including US federal and state courts, UK courts (England & Wales, Scotland), Canada, India, Germany, Australia, and others. Coverage is deepest for US and UK common law jurisdictions, which covers the majority of commercial litigation matters.
Can financial calculator handle complex damages models?
Financial Calculator performs DCF analysis, NPV/IRR calculations, multi-year scenario modeling, and sensitivity analysis. For litigation damages work, it handles lost profits before-and-after models, unjust enrichment quantification, and present value calculations with custom discount rates and prejudgment interest.
How far back do SEC enforcement records go?
Regulatory Actions covers SEC enforcement history on EDGAR back to the early 1990s. You can search by company name, ticker, or violation type and pull the full administrative and civil enforcement history — relevant for establishing prior knowledge, pattern of conduct, and background facts.
Can academic research support Daubert challenges?
Academic Research searches peer-reviewed papers with citation data and author information. For expert witness preparation and Daubert challenges, it surfaces published critiques of opposing experts' methodologies, studies supporting your expert's approach, and general acceptance evidence for econometric and financial methods.
Is compliance screening suitable for litigation use?
Compliance Screening produces structured match reports with confidence scores and source citations, suitable for inclusion in expert reports and as investigative exhibits. For courtroom use, all matches should be verified directly against primary list sources — the tool provides the search and initial triage.
Give your AI superpowers.
Get started for free
Works in Chat, Cowork and Code