Try Claude
Web SearchWeb, news, images & maps — one tool
AI Tools for Forensic Consultants
AI tools that help forensic consultants investigate financial fraud, research regulatory actions, screen entities, and build evidence-based expert reports.
Get started for free
Works in Chat, Cowork and Code
OFAC SDN Matches
1 confirmed match · Subject 7 (individual) · requires manual review
PEP Database
Subject 4: former government procurement official · 2 adverse media hits
Close-Name Hits
2 subjects flagged for manual review · confidence score 74–78%
EU / UN Lists
No direct matches across remaining 17 subjects
Priority Escalation
Subject 4 → enhanced due diligence recommended
Entity and individual screening
Screen individuals and entities against sanctions lists, PEP databases, adverse media, and law enforcement watchlists at the start of every investigation. Establish the background risk profile of subjects before deep-dive analysis.
Screen these 8 individuals involved in a suspected procurement fraud scheme. Check OFAC, EU sanctions, UN lists, PEP databases, and adverse media for any red flags.
8 individuals screened. 1 confirmed PEP match (Subject 4 — former government procurement official, two adverse media hits). 2 close-name hits requiring manual review. Subject 4 flagged as high priority for enhanced due diligence. Report with match details and confidence scores generated.
ToolRouter screen_entity
Subject 4 (Priority)
PEP match · former government procurement official · 2 adverse media hits
OFAC / EU / UN
No direct matches on remaining 7 subjects
Close-Name Hits
2 subjects require manual review · confidence 74–78%
Screening Output
Match details and confidence scores in attached report
SEC filing analysis for financial fraud
Pull and analyze SEC filings to identify financial statement red flags — auditor changes, material weaknesses, related party transactions, revenue recognition anomalies, and sudden accounting policy shifts.
Pull 10-K filings for Luckin Coffee from 2018 to 2021 and extract all auditor reports, management disclosures of internal control weaknesses, and related party transaction footnotes.
Extracted 4 annual filings. Key findings: KPMG resigned as auditor Feb 2020; Ernst & Young qualified opinion in 2019 flagged revenue recognition methodology; related party transactions with supplier Luckin's chairman's other entities totaling $2.3B not fully disclosed. Material weakness in internal controls disclosed 2020.
ToolRouter search_filings
YearEventFlag
2019Ernst & Young qualified opinion · revenue recognitionHigh risk
Feb 2020KPMG resigned as auditorCritical
2020Related-party transactions $2.3B disclosed (undisclosed previously)Critical
2020Material weakness in internal controlsCritical
4 annual filings reviewed · multiple red flags across all periods
Corporate registry and ownership investigation
Look up company registration details, director history, ownership structures, and financial filings to trace beneficial ownership and identify undisclosed relationships between entities under investigation.
Look up the UK Companies House registration for these 4 entities. I need director names, appointment history, PSC (beneficial ownership) filings, and any previous names or addresses.
Pulled 4 company profiles. Entity 2 and Entity 4 share a director (resigned same date — restructuring signal). Entity 3: 3 previous names over 5 years. PSC filing for Entity 1 shows offshore beneficial owner not disclosed in contracts. Ownership map compiled.
ToolRouter get_company
EntityDirector eventPsc filing
Entity 1CurrentOffshore beneficial owner undisclosed in contracts
Entity 2Resigned (same date as Entity 4)Filed
Entity 3CurrentFiled
Entity 4Resigned (same date as Entity 2)Filed
Ownership map compiled · 4 of 4 entities flagged
Regulatory enforcement and case law research
Research prior SEC, DOJ, and international enforcement actions on similar fraud typologies to benchmark your investigation and build the legal framing for expert reports and testimony.
Find SEC and DOJ enforcement actions involving channel stuffing and revenue recognition fraud at technology companies in the past decade. Summarize the schemes, evidence gathered, and penalties.
Found 14 enforcement actions. Most cited evidence: inconsistent DSO trends, distributor side agreements, returned goods spiking post-period. Notable cases: Motorola Solutions (2019, $100M SEC fine), Synthorx, and 3 smaller tech firms. Median fine: $34M. Full citation list and case summaries compiled.
ToolRouter search_actions
CompanyYearKey evidence
Motorola Solutions Inc2019Distributor side agreements · DSO spike
Synthorx2020Returns spiking post-period
Tech Firm A2021Revenue reversal in subsequent quarter
Tech Firm B2023Inconsistent DSO · distributor incentive emails
14 total enforcement actions · median fine $34M · full citation list compiled
ToolRouter search_cases
Most Cited Evidence
Distributor side agreements · inconsistent DSO trends · returned goods spikes
Median Fine (SEC)
$34M across 14 actions (2015–2024)
Notable Precedent
Motorola Solutions (2019) · $100M · channel stuffing
People search and background research
Research individuals of interest in investigations — trace online profiles, professional history, public records connections, and media mentions across platforms.
Research the online presence, professional history, and public records connections for this individual. They are suspected of involvement in invoice fraud. Name: [redacted]. Last known location: Miami, FL.
Found LinkedIn profile (VP Operations at 3 companies over 8 years — all dissolved), 2 social media profiles with location data, 1 civil lawsuit mentioned in Florida court records, and business registration in Nevada. Professional history shows pattern of short-tenure at companies with subsequent financial difficulties.
ToolRouter deep_search
LinkedIn Profile
VP Operations at 3 companies over 8 years — all subsequently dissolved
Social Media
2 profiles with location data (Miami, FL confirmed)
Public Records
1 civil lawsuit mentioned in Florida court records
Business Registration
Nevada LLC registration — no operational presence
Pattern Assessment
Short tenures at companies with subsequent financial difficulties
Ready-to-use prompts
Entity sanctions screening
Screen these company names and their known directors against OFAC SDN, EU consolidated sanctions, UK sanctions, and global PEP databases. Include close-name matches and adverse media results.
SEC fraud enforcement search
Find SEC enforcement actions for Ponzi schemes and investment fraud against private fund advisers from 2020 to 2025. Include the fraud amount, victim count, and sentences where known.
Company registry lookup
Pull the Companies House record for [company name]. I need: date of incorporation, all current and resigned directors with dates, PSC beneficial ownership filings, any county court judgments, and previous registered names.
SEC filing red flag review
Search SEC EDGAR for 10-K filings of [company] from 2019-2024. Extract management's report on internal controls, auditor opinions, related party transactions, and any restated financial statements.
Fraud typology research
Research the forensic red flags and investigation methodology for suspected accounts payable fraud in a manufacturing company. Include ACFE guidance, common concealment methods, and data analytics tests.
Case law research
Find UK court cases involving fraudulent misrepresentation in commercial contracts over the past 5 years. Focus on cases where forensic accounting evidence was central to the judgment.
Background person search
Research publicly available information on [person name], suspected of involvement in a corporate fraud. Search professional history, social profiles, media mentions, and litigation records.
FCPA research
Research recent DOJ and SEC FCPA enforcement actions involving pharmaceutical companies. Summarize the alleged conduct, jurisdictions involved, cooperation credit given, and settlement amounts.
Tools to power your best work
SEC FilingsSEC EDGAR filings & financial data
Deep ResearchAI research reports with citations
Regulatory ActionsSEC, CFPB, FDIC & Federal Register
Word DocumentsCreate, read & modify Word docs
People SearchFind anyone across 500+ sites
Company LookupCompany data for UK, US & EU
Compliance ScreeningAML, sanctions, PEP & due diligence investigations
Legal ResearchCase law, statutes, regulations & legislation worldwide
165+ tools.
One conversation.
Everything forensic consultants need from AI, connected to the assistant you already use. No extra apps, no switching tabs.
Investigation subject due diligence
Build a comprehensive background profile on an investigation subject — sanctions, ownership, corporate history, and public records.
Financial statement fraud investigation
Systematically review a company's public filings for fraud red flags before conducting the deeper forensic analysis.
Expert report preparation
Build the factual and legal research foundation for an expert witness report or fraud assessment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which databases does compliance screening cover for investigations?
Compliance Screening covers OFAC SDN and non-SDN lists, EU consolidated sanctions, UN Security Council sanctions, HM Treasury UK sanctions, global PEP databases, international wanted person lists, and adverse media. It supports batch screening and returns confidence-scored match reports suitable for investigation documentation.
Can company lookup trace complex ownership structures?
Company Lookup provides director appointment and resignation history, PSC (persons with significant control) beneficial ownership filings, and previous company names from UK Companies House, US state registries, and EU registries. Complex ownership structures often become visible through shared directors and registration addresses.
How far back do SEC filing records go?
SEC Filings searches the EDGAR database which contains filings back to the early 1990s. You can pull 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, proxy statements, and other filings across the full history of a public company — useful for multi-year forensic reviews and identifying when anomalies first appeared.
Is people search data suitable for court or investigative use?
People Search aggregates publicly available information including social profiles, professional history, and public records. It's suitable for investigative leads and background research. For formal court proceedings, primary source verification of all findings is required — the tool surfaces leads, not admissible evidence on its own.
Can case law research support expert witness preparation?
Case Law searches across 15+ jurisdictions including US, UK, India, Canada, and Germany. For forensic consultants preparing expert reports or testimony, it surfaces relevant precedents on evidentiary standards, fraud definitions, and comparable case outcomes that strengthen the legal framing of findings.
Give your AI superpowers.
Get started for free
Works in Chat, Cowork and Code