Try Claude
Content RepurposerTurn any content into posts, scripts, and articles
AI Tools for Fraud Investigators
AI tools that help fraud investigators research entities, trace financial patterns, access regulatory filings, monitor compliance databases, and document case findings.
Get started for free
Works in Chat, Cowork and Code
OFAC SDN
No matches on entity or named directors
EU Consolidated List
No matches
PEP Database
No politically exposed persons identified
Adverse Media
2 hits — OCCRP 2021 report, Cyprus shell network
Overall Rating
HIGH risk — indirect sanctions exposure detected
Entity and individual screening
Screen subjects against global sanctions lists, politically exposed persons databases, and adverse media in seconds. Build comprehensive risk profiles for companies, individuals, and beneficial ownership chains before or during an investigation.
Screen the following individual for OFAC, EU, and UN sanctions, PEP status, and adverse media. Subject: Aleksei Petrov, Russian national, DOB 1973-03-14, listed as director of 3 shell companies.
Screening results for Aleksei Petrov: No direct OFAC/EU/UN match. PEP database: no match. Adverse media: 2 hits — 2021 investigative report (OCCRP) linking subject to Cyprus shell company network associated with sanctioned individuals. Beneficial ownership research recommended. Risk rating: HIGH (indirect sanctions exposure).
ToolRouter screen_entity
OFAC/EU/UN
No direct match
PEP Database
No match
Adverse Media
2 hits — OCCRP 2021, Cyprus shell network link
Risk Rating
HIGH — indirect sanctions exposure
Company and corporate structure research
Map beneficial ownership chains, trace corporate structures across jurisdictions, and identify undisclosed related parties. Pull registered director histories, filing anomalies, and dissolution patterns that signal shell company activity.
Look up the ownership structure, directors, and filing history for Nexfield Holdings Ltd, registered in the UK. Identify any related companies with the same directors.
Nexfield Holdings Ltd (UK, Companies House): Incorporated 2019. 2 current directors: James Whitmore (UK national) and Maria Sousa (Portuguese national). Same directors appear on 4 other UK entities: Greenfield Capital Ltd, Apex Ventures Ltd, 3 with dormant status. Latest filing: late by 4 months (compliance flag). No accounts filed for 2 entities — dissolution pending.
ToolRouter lookup_company
Incorporated
2019 · England & Wales
Director 1
James Whitmore · UK national
Director 2
Maria Sousa · Portuguese national
Related Entities
4 UK companies share same directors — 3 dormant
Filing Status
Accounts overdue 4 months — dissolution pending
Regulatory enforcement research
Search FinCEN, FINRA, OCC, and SEC enforcement actions to identify prior regulatory infractions by subjects. Research penalty history and consent orders that establish patterns of fraudulent behavior.
Search for all FINRA and SEC enforcement actions against Meridian Capital Advisors LLC and its principals in the past 10 years.
Found 3 enforcement actions: SEC cease-and-desist order (2017) — unsuitable investment recommendations. FINRA fine ($285,000, 2019) — failure to supervise. FINRA bar order (2022) — principal Jason Merritt barred for unauthorized trading. Subject firm has pattern of repeat enforcement. Documents attached.
ToolRouter search_actions
YearAgencyAction
2017SECCease-and-desist — unsuitable recommendations
2019FINRAFailure to supervise
2022FINRABar order — principal Jason Merritt
3 enforcement actions · pattern of repeat infractions
ToolRouter search_filings
FormDateDescription
Form ADV2024-03-15Annual update — AUM $42M, 180 clients
Form U42022-11-01Jason Merritt — FINRA bar disclosure
Source: EDGAR · 2 relevant filings found
Legal case and precedent research
Research fraud-related case law, sentencing patterns, and evidentiary standards across jurisdictions. Support case theory development and prosecution strategy with relevant legal precedents.
What are the current federal legal standards for proving wire fraud versus mail fraud, and what evidence types have courts found most persuasive in recent convictions?
Wire fraud (18 USC 1343) elements: scheme to defraud, use of wire communications, intent. Recent circuit courts have upheld convictions based on: email chains (94% of recent cases), financial transfer records, and co-conspirator testimony. Key 9th Circuit ruling (2023): metadata timestamps admissible for establishing knowledge timeline. Mail fraud elements virtually identical — jurisdiction lies wherever communication traveled.
ToolRouter search_cases
Wire Fraud Elements
18 USC 1343 — scheme, wire use, intent
Most Persuasive Evidence
Email chains (94% of recent convictions)
9th Circuit 2023
Metadata timestamps admissible for knowledge timeline
Mail Fraud
Virtually identical — jurisdiction where communication traveled
Financial market and asset research
Research stock transactions, trading patterns, and public financial data to identify suspicious timing in securities fraud investigations. Correlate market activity with known events to establish trading timelines.
Show me historical trading volume and price movement for ACME Corp stock (ticker: ACME) in the 30 days before and after their Q3 earnings announcement on November 15th, 2023.
ACME Corp (ACME): Pre-announcement (Oct 16 - Nov 14): Average daily volume 245,000 shares. Anomaly detected: Nov 12-13, volume spike to 2.1M shares (+758%), price moved from $18.40 to $22.10 (+20%). Earnings release Nov 15 (beat by 34%). Post-announcement volume normalized. The pre-announcement spike warrants further investigation for potential insider trading.
ToolRouter get_quote
Daily Volume (000s)
Price ($)
Case documentation and reporting
Compile investigation findings, source documents, and evidence summaries into structured case reports. Generate Suspicious Activity Report narratives and prosecution referral packages from investigation notes.
Convert these investigation notes into a Suspicious Activity Report narrative for FinCEN: subject made 47 cash deposits of $9,800-9,900 over 90 days totaling $468,500, structured to avoid $10K CTR threshold, deposits at 8 different branches.
Drafted SAR Narrative: described structuring pattern (47 transactions, $9,800-9,900 range, 90-day window, $468,500 total), identified as willful structuring under 31 USC 5324, documented branch dispersion (8 locations), flagged BSA/AML violation indicators. Formatted per FinCEN SAR filing requirements with activity description, subject information fields, and law enforcement contact sections.
ToolRouter repurpose_content
Activity Type
Willful structuring — 31 USC 5324 · 47 transactions
Amount
$468,500 total · $9,800–$9,900 per transaction
Time Window
90 days · 8 different branch locations
SAR Format
Formatted per FinCEN requirements · all fields populated
Status
Draft ready for investigator review and filing
Ready-to-use prompts
Screen entity for sanctions
Screen the following company name and its 4 listed directors against OFAC, EU, UN, and UK sanctions lists, PEP databases, and adverse media. Flag any indirect exposure through known associates.
Map corporate ownership
Look up the full ownership structure, director history, and related companies for a Delaware LLC. Identify any common directors with other registered entities and any filing irregularities.
SEC enforcement search
Search SEC EDGAR for all enforcement actions, consent orders, and deregistration proceedings against broker-dealer firms in the Southeast US in the past 5 years involving churning or unsuitable recommendations.
Insider trading research
Pull historical trading volume and price data for this stock in the 45 days before a major merger announcement. Identify any statistically anomalous volume spikes that preceded the public announcement.
Draft SAR narrative
Draft a FinCEN SAR narrative for a customer who received 23 wire transfers from 7 different countries totaling $1.2M over 60 days, with no apparent business purpose, followed by immediate cash withdrawals.
Wire fraud case law
Research recent federal wire fraud and computer fraud prosecutions involving cryptocurrency. What evidence types have courts found most persuasive, and what are the current sentencing guidelines?
Regulatory action history
Find all FINRA, OCC, and FinCEN enforcement actions in the past 3 years against financial institutions fined for BSA/AML violations over $1 million.
Identity fraud research
Research current methodologies used in synthetic identity fraud schemes targeting financial institutions, and what transaction patterns are most reliable as detection indicators.
Tools to power your best work
SEC FilingsSEC EDGAR filings & financial data
Deep ResearchAI research reports with citations
Stock MarketQuotes, history & analyst insights
Regulatory ActionsSEC, CFPB, FDIC & Federal Register
Company LookupCompany data for UK, US & EU
Compliance ScreeningAML, sanctions, PEP & due diligence investigations
Legal ResearchCase law, statutes, regulations & legislation worldwide
165+ tools.
One conversation.
Everything fraud investigators need from AI, connected to the assistant you already use. No extra apps, no switching tabs.
Initial subject background investigation
When opening a new fraud case, rapidly build a complete picture of subject entities and individuals.
Securities fraud investigation
Investigate suspected insider trading or market manipulation with financial data and regulatory research.
SAR and regulatory filing package
Compile documentation for regulatory reporting and law enforcement referral.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which sanctions databases does Compliance Screening cover?
Compliance Screening covers OFAC (SDN and non-SDN lists), EU consolidated sanctions list, UN Security Council list, UK Treasury sanctions, and 20+ additional lists. It also checks PEP databases, INTERPOL notices, and aggregated adverse media from news sources. Coverage is updated continuously.
Can I use company lookup to trace beneficial ownership through multiple jurisdictions?
Company Lookup covers UK (Companies House), US (state registries), and EU company registries. For multi-jurisdictional beneficial ownership chains involving offshore jurisdictions, combine Company Lookup for registered entities with Deep Research for open-source intelligence on opaque ownership structures.
How far back does the SEC EDGAR enforcement action search go?
SEC Filings searches EDGAR, which contains enforcement actions dating back to the early 1990s. The database is comprehensive for SEC matters, but for FINRA and other SRO enforcement actions, the Regulatory Actions tool searches those specific databases. Always cross-reference both for complete enforcement history.
Can these tools help identify structuring and money laundering patterns?
The tools support research and documentation around suspected structuring, but don't analyze transaction data directly — that requires access to the institution's own transaction monitoring system. These tools are most valuable for entity research, adverse media, regulatory history, and SAR narrative drafting.
Are AI-generated investigation summaries admissible in legal proceedings?
Documents generated by Content Repurposer are drafting tools — the underlying facts, sources, and conclusions are the investigator's own work product. As with any documentation, the investigator is responsible for accuracy. Legal admissibility depends on proper sourcing and chain of custody, not the drafting tool used.
Give your AI superpowers.
Get started for free
Works in Chat, Cowork and Code